Representation-Driven Reinforcement Learning

We present a representation-driven framework for reinforcement learning. By representing policies as estimates of their expected values, we leverage techniques from contextual bandits to guide exploration and exploitation. Particularly, embedding a policy network into a linear feature space allows us to reframe the exploration-exploitation problem as a representation-exploitation problem, where good policy representations enable optimal exploration. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework through its application to evolutionary and policy gradient-based approaches, leading to significantly improved performance compared to traditional methods. Our framework provides a new perspective on reinforcement learning, highlighting the importance of policy representation in determining optimal exploration-exploitation strategies.Comment: Accepted to ICML 202

A Convex Relaxation Approach to Bayesian Regret Minimization in Offline Bandits

Algorithms for offline bandits must optimize decisions in uncertain environments using only offline data. A compelling and increasingly popular objective in offline bandits is to learn a policy which achieves low Bayesian regret with high confidence. An appealing approach to this problem, inspired by recent offline reinforcement learning results, is to maximize a form of lower confidence bound (LCB). This paper proposes a new approach that directly minimizes upper bounds on Bayesian regret using efficient conic optimization solvers. Our bounds build on connections among Bayesian regret, Value-at-Risk (VaR), and chance-constrained optimization. Compared to prior work, our algorithm attains superior theoretical offline regret bounds and better results in numerical simulations. Finally, we provide some evidence that popular LCB-style algorithms may be unsuitable for minimizing Bayesian regret in offline bandits

Modeling Recommender Ecosystems: Research Challenges at the Intersection of Mechanism Design, Reinforcement Learning and Generative Models

Modern recommender systems lie at the heart of complex ecosystems that couple the behavior of users, content providers, advertisers, and other actors. Despite this, the focus of the majority of recommender research -- and most practical recommenders of any import -- is on the local, myopic optimization of the recommendations made to individual users. This comes at a significant cost to the long-term utility that recommenders could generate for its users. We argue that explicitly modeling the incentives and behaviors of all actors in the system -- and the interactions among them induced by the recommender's policy -- is strictly necessary if one is to maximize the value the system brings to these actors and improve overall ecosystem "health". Doing so requires: optimization over long horizons using techniques such as reinforcement learning; making inevitable tradeoffs in the utility that can be generated for different actors using the methods of social choice; reducing information asymmetry, while accounting for incentives and strategic behavior, using the tools of mechanism design; better modeling of both user and item-provider behaviors by incorporating notions from behavioral economics and psychology; and exploiting recent advances in generative and foundation models to make these mechanisms interpretable and actionable. We propose a conceptual framework that encompasses these elements, and articulate a number of research challenges that emerge at the intersection of these different disciplines

Ranking with Popularity Bias: User Welfare under Self-Amplification Dynamics

While popularity bias is recognized to play a role in recommmender (and other ranking-based) systems, detailed analyses of its impact on user welfare have largely been lacking. We propose a general mechanism by which item popularity, item quality, and position bias can impact user choice, and how it can negatively impact the collective user utility of various recommender policies. Formulating the problem as a non-stationary contextual bandit, we highlight the importance of exploration, not to eliminate popularity bias, but to mitigate its negative effects. First, naive popularity-biased recommenders are shown to induce linear regret by conflating item quality and popularity. More generally, we show that, even in linear settings, identifiability of item quality may not be possible due to the confounding effects of popularity bias. However, under sufficient variability assumptions, we develop an efficient UCB-style algorithm and prove efficient regret guarantees. We complement our analysis with several simulation studies